Posted in Miscellaneous

Tracking: A Three Handed Issue?

propicTracking.  My first graders use that word to mean following me with their eyes to help them pay attention.  A lot of grownups in the educational world use it to mean putting kids on different educational avenues based on their ability and learning pace.  Wikipedia defines tracking as, “separating pupils by academic ability into groups for all subjects or certain classes and curriculum within a school. Students attend academic classes only with students whose overall academic achievement is the same as their own.” Interesting concept, no?  I’ve thought about it considerably and the jury’s still out.

On one hanScreen Shot 2013-03-27 at 10.43.45 PMd, grouping kids into classes based more on the child’s learning pace is much more logical than assuming that the greatest commonality between children is their birth year. For example, some precocious first graders may read at a higher level than is typical while some fourth graders may be at the same level despite their advanced age.  And that’s not a bad thing.  Having a class of children who are more intellectually similar in their learning style and pace allows the teacher to more effectively access the group and individual simultaneously and thereby facilitate deeper learning for all.  And under such a system, the kids who are still getting the hang of things won’t feel the discouraging pressure of trying to think the same way their more mature peers do.  Each group can have genuine and meaningful success in its own sphere.

On the other hand, stratifying and labeling people in any context is the premise for many a dystopic cautionary tale. (Think Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.) Pigeonholing kids into “smart/fast” and “slow/dumb” classes could have a lasting and negative impact on their development.  Being told you’re a little genius can give you a big head and a superiority complex. Being underestimated and talked down to can make you settle for less than your potential or stunt your intellectual expansion.  Also, grouping children with those who think the same way they do limits their opportunities for interacting with different levels, thought processes, and perspectives.  The fatal flaw of the ability grouping system is its potential for arbitrary decisions based on a limited understanding of intelligence. Such decisions could result in children being misplaced in the system and getting lost developmentally.

Screen Shot 2013-03-27 at 10.40.22 PMOn a hypothetical third hand, we have a cooperative model in which the more mentally agile children assist the teacher in guiding the others to discovery.  This model doesn’t have much to do with tracking in that it doesn’t stratify children according to ability.  But it recognizes and utilizes the gradient of intellectual development by expecting the more savvy children to coach and encourage their peers. On the other side of this model, the more ponderous bunch gets a chance to learn from a variety of teachers (including their classmates) and thereby solidify information. My mentor uses the term “fast finisher” to refer to the children in his classes who do just that—finish the task quickly.  He then employs these “fast finishers” to be mini-teachers and help their classmates who haven’t finished yet.  The kids who finish first have grasped the concept effectively and are then eager to share their knowledge with their classmates.  Teaching helps them retain the learning, and the teachees often absorb material better from peers than teachers.  Perhaps with this integrated system, the fast track students won’t get as far ahead as they could on their own, but that idea begs the question of priorities.  Do we want our students to come out of elementary school full-fledged smart alecks or decent human beings who can cooperate with their peers? Will tracking even significantly impact that outcome?  Is it helpful or harmful or even just neutral in children’s intellectual development? Thoughts, anyone?



I love to write. I love to teach. I get to write about teaching. Lucky me.

One thought on “Tracking: A Three Handed Issue?

  1. Great thoughts. I have often wondered the same about my first graders with their mixed bag of skills and background knowledge and the differing pace at which they can absorb new information and apply it. Of course we want the fast finishers to come out of elementary school as decent human beings rather than smart alecks. I have encountered first graders, who, by the tender age of six, have already been told so many times that they are special and smarter than their peers that they do tend to lord it over those who don’t learn quite as quickly. Perhaps they are doing it innocently, not really understanding how obnoxious an attitude they are displaying when they say to another child, “My brain learns faster than yours. That’s why the teacher gives me different work to do.” Perhaps they are just repeating what they have been told by adults in their lives. I wonder, however, might we help them become decent human beings who are willing to patiently and kindly tutor their peers and still provide a challenge to their intellect in order that they might develop their potential? How do we nurture the inclination to be kinder and gentler with their peers who need many more repetitions of the same material to get it? In my experience some “brainy” kids really do not seem to have the patience to hang with less developed peers while others are very compassionate and very good at it. It is a delicate balance that a teacher must try to achieve in helping children become well-rounded individuals and help them understand that, as important as academic achievement is, a total human being has other abilities that need to be developed as well. Interesting concepts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s